Full text of "Quincy Sun Jan - June " See other formats. hope church - christian reformed church in na - ; hope congregational church - ; hope for new haven inc - ;. Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet. Otto, Palatums Comes de Scvra met 27 subjicitur vel substituitur. Amberg with a clothing business at this address. Unitarian Clergy- man settled at Southbridge and Kingston, d. Is dating exclusive rules notes II L bore Lannoy plain, having inherited from the last of the first line of Franchimont 1 the armes in full. The South African War had begun and Bristol, as a major port, was put on a war footing. What could it be? As well as making communication possible between both platforms, the bridge was a godsend for pedestrians who could continue their travels if the level crossing gates na support meeting congregational church hopkington nh closed.
Related Videos:First Congregational Church - Kalamazoo, MI
Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet. Games Vectrex Atari Full text of " The genealogy, history, and alliances of the American house of Delano, to Iowa — Delano in Wright Co.
From to A. Information identifying unconnected coat-armors with the lines of Lannoy to which they belong will be received with pleasure and a suitable acknowledgement. The color or metal of the shield is given first, then the principal charge on that shield or field and then any additional bearings follow. Or — gold, yellow — or. Argent — silver, white — arg. Gules — red — gu. Azure — blue — az. Vert, sinople — green — v.
Sable — black — sa. Proper — the natural color of any object blazoned — ppr. In all other cases ditto will give place of b. When place of death is not given it is at pi.
Lannoy, en sur- tout Barbancon. Being Lannoy surmounted by Molembais. Placed upon the ducally crowned heKiet. Argent and sinople — vert. Bonnes Nouvelles — good tidings. Two unicorns argent, accornees crinee. To dexter — White, 3 lions rampant vert armea tongues gules, crowns yellow. To sinister — White, 3 lions ran. The whole supported upon a terrace of nature. The hrst v England; the latter formed the Virginia aristocracy. Some were graduates of Cambridge or Oxford; lers, younger sons seeking a new home, either as bachelors or nily men.
Nearly all the early settlers were not only entitled to ;ear coat-armor, but were punctilious in its use. These are the families represented in the early history of heraldry in America. The position assumed by this select few has stimulated research in genealogy and heraldry — the same right being continually established by other American families. Intercourse was, as we all know, maintained with the old home and old friends, as well a s the slow means of communication would permit.
What is said in this regard to New England may be applie d to the plantations of Rhode Island, Virginia, the city of New Amsterdam and its great outlying estates, ruled over by the Patroons, the Georgia and Carolina grants, and the Louisiana settlements, with the aristocratic French emigrees. Out from thi varied lot of European names and families came the Americar nation. One finds that the settlers bore the coat-armor pertaining to their families.
Not one, probably, of all these early immigrant, had the slightest intention or desire to alienate the new lands from the protection of the crown. They were loyal each to his father- land — over a century must pass before the break would begin. Their old homes held many and dear relatives. Alone in a wild land their thoughts would naturally dwell on old ways and home customs, many of which they reestablished in t new land.
And all this helped to continue vthe use of official and family coat-armor. The French Huguenots added their ancestral armes to the growing roll of American heraldry. Men who were otherwise quick to discard foolish and useless customs, respected and con- tinued with their surnames the use of seals and armes. We ac- cepted the common law of England through ancestors who en- grafted heraldry upon this country.
That it may with honor be extensively developed, there should be little doubt from the present survey of the subject. Puritan and Cavalier both respected and looked to their father- land. Differing in religion, they both accepted, without question,! In a kingdom one may be dispossessed of coat-armor by royal order, but Americans are more fortunate, for no power can deprive them of the family name and its coat-of-armes.
The fact is indisputable that the different families retained their surnames as used by them before the establishment of the Repub- lic. Xo thought was ever entertained of doing otherwise, and coat-armor, including the crest, is the direct personal attachment of a name.
As descendants of the European houses who used coat-of-armes, we find the settlers of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecti- cut, called Puritans, with which are included many Huguenot families coming from Leyden and other ports of Holland. Then the Dutch of New Amsterdam, now known as the Knickerbocker families. All through the south, as in Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, are found the Cavalier descendants. This list comprises he families who are known to have borne armes, not only before ,ie Revolution, but after the Republic was established, and all of leir descendants to-day who possess or are aware of this inherited ight still use seals and armes upon family plate, carriages, etc.
That dishonest as well as ignorant people use coat-armor belong-. In answer, first look at the Republic of Switzerland, which has had a regi established heraldry for centuries, its families being proud of theii - ancient descent, which coat-armor often denotes as well as prove: Up to tno United States was under the crown, having royal governors for each colony.
Deeds to estates, personal property, etc. Coat-armor, being; personal property, was naturally included in this acceptan. We have the proof this in the continued use of amies by the founders of the Republic. But most conclusive of all the mass of proof of the American! On the contrary, a different conclusion is deducible from the practice of Congress and the States, all of which have established some kind of Armorial De- vices to authenticate their official instruments. It shows connection, desctVft an 1 important marriages — being a guide to historians, genesth-gists and pedigree compilers.
It began seven hundred years itbo as an aid to the identification of persons, and to-day it exists exactly in the same sense. The use of heraldic bearings is not indicative of rank or title. In all countries is this true to-day, and in them all men, if gentlemen— as we in America understand the term — are entitled to this name dtair 16 on, lor legal as well as social purposes.
Equally true is this of le helmet, erest, mantle or flourish and motto. Inch belongs to those ennobled as a notice to that cirect. But n this country there is no reason win they should not be used.
In this country we preach that all men are equal, md long before that doctrine was accepted politically, coat-armor nade all men above servants equal. There is absolutely no class Dr distinction in heraldic bearings, all coat-armor is complete, and finished, and equal, one shield to another, the amies of a king are no more, no less, and no better than those of the poorest com- moner of the kingdom. Men have made a distinction as royal, loble, and commoner, but it is a purely personal attribute having no connection or relation with the usage of coat-armor.
Indeed, many English and Continental familic s are far older and of a purer blood than most of the ennobled and royal houses of Europe to- day. In fact, abroad, as here at home, the true nobility of a country is the old families who seek no tinsel distinctions, but are content to be the backbone of the country.
And these are the folk who bear coat-armor. In the English roll of armes to-day, there are some sixty-six thousand blazonings. Of these, less than three thousand are in the peerage and baronetage, the others are die gentry or people of England.
In Europe the roll contains over one hundred thousand names, of which not over ten thousand are ennobled with titles. The Erench considered a gentleman as being noble — indicated by "de" — and all were equal as such — also true of their coat-armor.
Their descendants here to-day have the same right as those of English descent. So it is true of the Dutch, German and other settlers from the continent. Again, we find coat-armor in the earliest times was closely con- nected with the bearing of surnames, the one begetting the other.
These being called armes parlantes, canting armes, or armes which denote through the charge the surname: Thus is shown the close connection between heraldry and the surname. The lat- ter began with designating the place of residence, abode, occupa- tion and personal attributes. Not until after the XIII century were surnames established, and almost, if not at the same time, heraldry became a regulated usage.
So from the first, armes and surnames in Europe have been synonymous for centuries. As we accepted the right of inherit ing family names, and through usage the right to bear arme. The following will show most effectively that coat-armor has been and still is officially used and, consequently, recognized by the National and State Govern- ments.
The Department of State published, in , an account of the formation and adoption of the Great Seal of the United States. Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jeffer- son were a committee to adopt a form for an official seal.
The one they devised was finally refused — quarterly of six. After passing through several stages of modification the present form was adopted in The President has a semi-official seal.
The State Departments, the U. Senate and House of Representa- tives, and the Department of Justice also have their proper official arms. Each State, on being admitted to the Union, adopted an official seal and coat-of-arms. The royal seal of Eng land was used for Massachusetts until Xew Jersey used, in , the seal of Berkeley and Carteret. The history of these seals is an interesting proof of the official recognition of the growth of American coat-armor. The ecclesiastical and corporation seals form another distinct proof, sanctioned by use, of the right to bear coat-armor in this country.